Thursday, November 1, 2007

Saskatchewan Leaders Debate

On Tuesday night, the 3 leaders of the main political parties running in the 2007 provincial election participated in a debate.
Typically I would not watch the debate, but this year I decided to, particularly because I am taking this political science class & volunteering my time to a political party - hence I should probably be aware of the main issues and the parties stance on these issues. Well I wish I could say I took a lot away from the debate - but mostly took the idea that I shouldn't waste another hour watching a debate again! I cannot stand listening to the leaders bicker amongst each other and try and talk all at once... am I supposed to understand when 3 people are all talking at the same time?!
To make things a little more exciting we tried to make a drinking game out of the debate. The rules were: 1) Drink when anyone accuses the NDP of over spending; 2) Drink when anyone accuses the Sask Party of privatizing corporations; 3) Drink when anyone alludes to the Liberals winning no seats; and 4) Drink when the mediator had to interject to get them to be quiet. However, once the leaders would begin debating (yelling at one another) these rules didn't even work out so well because we couldn't even tell what most of them were saying! Needless to say there were a lot of drinks had from the mediator saying "GENTLEMEN, GENTLEMEN" numerous times!
I did not know much about these leaders prior to watching the debate, and I must say none of them impressed me.
Because of my beliefs and dislike of the Saskatchewan Party platform; I disagreed with most things Brad Wall said - I particularly like when he would avoid answering yes or no questions with just spouting out accusations to the other parties. This occurred when Calvert asked Wall if he cared about university students.
After having Shaine Peters come into our class, who I was quite impressed with; I was interested to see what David Karwacki had to say. My impression of Karwacki was that he was a bit of a goof - I felt like he was trying not to break out into laughter and had a smirk on his face all the time. Like what was with him talking about his grandma in his closing remarks while smirking all the time?! How am I supposed to take you seriously? Karwacki also had some laughable comments during the debate - like when he was talking about the highway from Weyburn to the States as a "beer run". Also when he blatantly said to Calvert that the NDP was going to lose!
I support the NDP, but that doesn't mean I was overly impressed with Calvert either. I agreed with much of his arguments as they are close to my own and liked his closing remarks much better than the other two. Although he said some of the right things for me; it doesn't mean that I believe he and the NDP government is going to uphold those promises (or have in the past).
I see the debate as another means to turn voters even more apathetic. It puts the leaders in a poor light as bickering immature children. Even if someone agreed with what the other leader said they would have to disagree and argue about it. The majority of the debate was 3 men arguing with one another and telling each other that they are completely wrong.

1 comment:

youngblondeandliberal said...

I'm not entirely sure that the debate would make anyone anymore apathetic than they all ready are.

I say this simply because those that are apathetic about the election process probably weren't watching.

Did it unimpress a lot of people? I don't doubt that it did.

I think we could have taken a lot more out of the debate with an effective moderator.